Here is the link to a live blog that I carried out with Karen Whiteley for Women's Views on News, from a debate called Counting the Costs of Childcare, organised by the Resolution Foundation.
The debate took place on 17 January 2013
Click here to read the full blog.
Search This Blog
Saturday, 19 January 2013
Friday, 18 January 2013
Live Blog - quotas for women on boards
Here is a link to a live blog that I carried out with Anna Reitman for Women's Views on News, from a debate on whether or not the EU should impose compulsary quotas for women on the boards of major companies.
The debate was organised by the UK European Parliament Information Office and the National Alliance of Women's Organisations on 5 October, 2012
Click here to read the full blog
The debate was organised by the UK European Parliament Information Office and the National Alliance of Women's Organisations on 5 October, 2012
Click here to read the full blog
Will the world now wake up to the atrocity of rape?
Story published on Women's Views on News 15 January, 2013
The India rape case is exposing the extent of violence against women worldwide
The India rape case is exposing the extent of violence against women worldwide
On 7 January, around 1,000 people demonstrated outside India House in London against
the horrific rape and murder of a young woman in Delhi.
This
was part of a growing wave of
demonstrations against violence towards women sweeping not just the Indian
sub-continent, but the whole world.
“We
felt a great sense of outrage. We wanted
to express our solidarity with Indian women,” said Rahila Gupta, of Southall
Black Sisters, who organised the demonstration.
“Sexual
abuse is happening all over the world.
The difference in India is the frequency, the intensity, the rate, the
range, the culture that there is in India.
“And
also people get away with stuff in India.
There isn’t really any prosecution for Police and others who are treated
with impunity.
“At
least in the West the Police are accountable to some extent, but even here the
clear up rate for rape is only 6%,” she said.
Many
of the women on the demonstration believed that the sheer ferocity of the Delhi
attack had proved a tipping point.
“It
came to a point when women in India thought enough was enough. There was so much tolerance but that incident
is where it came to a boiling point,” said Jos Juvah, who is originally from
India but has lived in the UK for many years.
But
Gupta provides an economic explanation for the apparently sudden upsurge of
protest.
“There
is very rapid economic growth going on in India and it is providing
opportunities for young women to get educated and have jobs.
“Young
women need to be out and have the freedom of the city. They need to have the
safety of the city.
“Here
is an example of a woman who did all the ‘right’ things, [I use that term
ironically].
“She
was accompanied by a man, there was no suggestion that her clothes were to
blame, her behaviour was to blame nothing, and yet she suffered the most
horrific rape.
“A
newly awoken Delhi, particularly Delhi, as there is a lot of multinational
activity on the outskirts of Delhi, and there’s a sense of, ‘how do we ensure
that our daughters are going to be safe when they go out to work’.”
“We
know that a lot of rape goes on against domestic workers for example. I hope
this case will open the door to debate about other women who suffer domestic
violence,” she said.
And
it certainly seems to be doing that, for now at least.
A
report by the Small Arms
Survey
finds that Kenya’s capital Nairobi is in ‘profound’ crisis, with grotesque
levels of violence against women spiralling out of control, as poverty
increases in its fetid slums, which house more than a million people.
And according to figures recently
issued by Deputy President Kgalema Motlanthe, ninety percent of South African
women have experienced emotional and physical abuse; seventy-one percent have
experienced sexual abuse; as many as five out of seven children are abused.
In
Peru, where an
estimated 35,000 pregnancies a year come about as a result of rape, women are
forced either to have an illegal abortion and face a possible three-month jail
term, or give birth to a rapists child.
A
coalition called Dejala
Decidir,
Let Her Decide, aim to collect the 60,000 signatures they need to petition
Congress to consider a Bill decriminalising abortion in the case of rape.
This
may not be easy, as signatories have to provide their government ID.
Some
may feel intimidated by this and many women, particularly in rural areas, most
affected by these issues, do not have ID’s.
Even if they get the signatures, a debate is not guaranteed the Catholic
Church still exerts great influence in Peru.
But
despite this, George Liendo, Director of PROMSEX,
says the time is ripe for a national dialogue.
“It’s not always easy to build a coalition in Peru, but there is
real energy for this campaign. People across the country want to put this on
the political agenda.”
In October 2012, the Uruguayan Congress voted to
decriminalise abortion in the
first twelve weeks of pregnancy.
And as Clare Abbot, who travelled down from Northampton to attend
Monday’s demonstration said: “Hopefully this demonstration will raise
awareness of women’s issues and hopefully have some impact.
“Hopefully
this will maintain momentum. That’s got to be a positive thing.”
Friday, 21 December 2012
Hands off the Equality Act
Story published on Women's Views on News, December 17, 2012
Reducing red
tape is no excuse for attacking women’s rights
In 2010 the
Government introduced the Equality Act, bringing together laws like the
Disability Discrimination, Race and Sex Discrimination Acts.
A year later,
David Cameron announced that the Act would be the target of the Red Tape Challenge, a cabinet Office initiative aimed at
cutting unnecessary regulation,
Members of the public, businesses and industry
experts were invited to scrutinise the Equality Act and put forward
recommendations for regulations which could be simplified, scrapped or
clarified.
Last spring Home Secretary Theresa May announced that, as
a result of the consultation, it would scrap the Third Party Harassment law
which means employers will no longer be liable if a worker is harassed by a
third party such as a customer.
Public bodies would not have to consider the impact
of their decisions on social class, and employment tribunals would no longer be
able to recommend employers make changes to policies covering all staff when an
employee successfully brought a discrimination case against them.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) had
its remit curtailed and its budget halved.
May also announced a review of the Public Sector
Equality Duty which requires all public bodies to eliminate
unlawful discrimination, advance equal opportunities and foster good relations
between different parts of the community regardless of race, gender sexuality
or religion.
Last Month Equality Minister Marian Miller announced
the steering group and Terms of Reference for the review.
The steering group will have just four months to
gather evidence, reach its conclusions and write its report. It can recommend the scrapping or amendment
of parts of the duty if it feels they are too costly to administer.
The Fawcett Society is
extremely concerned about this and said cutting red tape should not be at the
expense of women’s equality.
“The Equality Act is an extremely
important piece of law that brings together all preexisting equality law,
including all the provisions enshrined in The Equal Pay Act 1970 and the Sex
Discrimination Act 1975.
“Without this law, public bodies
would have no duty to consider how to eliminate unlawful discrimination,
including between women and men, and women would not be legally protected from
unequal treatment in the workplace”, it said in a statement.
Fawcett and other organizations representing groups
protected by the Act, are urging the public to visit the Red Tape Challenge website to register their
comments in support of the Equality Act.
Because, as Fawcett says - any backwards step - let
alone the repeal of this Act, would represent a transgression on the rights of
women in the UK today and would severely undermine efforts to achieve equality
between women and men in all spheres of life.
What the UK census says about women
Story published on Women's Views on News, December 19, 2012
The latest data shows England and Wales turning away from marriage,
but women still working less
Most of the tables in the latest census release are not
broken down by gender, so we will have to wait to see what these figures really
tell us about our changing roles.
But according to figures released on 11 December people
living in England and Wales are rejecting traditional values like marriage and
religion.
The proportion of people with no religious affiliation rose
from 15 to 25 per cent.
And the proportion of households containing a married couple
or same sex civil partnership fell from 37 to 33 per cent. The percentage of households containing a
cohabiting couple increased from 8 to 10 per cent.
We also seem more prepared to live with people from
different ethnic backgrounds. Twelve per
cent of households now contain people with more than one ethnicity, up from 9
per cent in 2001.
The proportion of those providing unpaid care to friends or
relatives has remained the same as in 2001 at 10 per cent. This is welcome as the majority
of unpaid carers are women.
But despite some evidence of changing social attitudes,
women continue to work fewer hours than men and are less likely to own their
own businesses.
A third of women work part-time, compared with 8 per cent of
men, and only 9 per cent are self-employed, compared with a fifth of men.
Women are more likely to be studying full time however, 5.7
per cent of women are students, compared with 4.3 per cent of men.
There are over a million more women than men registered for
the UK census, 28.5m women compared to 27.6m men.
While the main explanation for this is that women live
longer, Prof Jane Falkingham, director of the Centre for Population Change told
the BBC fewer women
chose to or have the opportunity to live and work abroad.
But there may be a more administrative explanation. “Men are
not good form-fillers,” she said.
Saturday, 8 December 2012
Autumn Statement bad news for women
In his Autumn Statement on 5 December the Chancellor George Osborne announced cuts to benefits, tax credits and tax changes which will save the Treasury £1.06bn.
But according to research, commissioned by Shadow Equalities Minister Yvette Cooper, 81 per cent of these savings, or £867 million, will come from women.
Anne Longfield, chief executive of 4Children explained: "What seems to be happening is there's a transference of targeting – from benefits which had gone primarily to women with children, to targeting personal allowance changes which are for everyone." So whilst most working people will welcome the extra £235 a year from an increase in their basic tax allowance, Working and Child Tax Credits, Child Benefit, Statutory Maternity and
Adoption pay, housing benefit and out of work benefits like Jobseekers Allowance will only increase be 1 per cent a year from April 2013, a real-terms cut of 1.7 - 2.2 per cent a year, if inflation remains at current levels.
Gllian Guy, chief executive of Citizen's Advice said: “The government can’t keep hitting the same people over and over again.
“Let’s not forget, below inflation benefit increases will not just hit people who are out of work. It will also hurt working families in low paid jobs who have already been hit by wage freezes and cuts in working hours.”
And as WVoN reported last week, a report by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation found that most working age people in poverty are now in work, rather than unemployed.
Geri Goddard, Chief Executive of the Fawcett Society, said women had already paid for two thirds of the changes to taxes and welfare since 2010, and women’s unemployment was at a 24-year high.
“The various policies unveiled in the name of growth offer little to support women's greater participation in the labour market or wider economy.
“While further investment in roads and other big infrastructure projects is welcome, few of the 1.01 million unemployed women will find jobs as a result.
She added: “Women will continue to act as shock absorbers for the cuts.
“It’s vital the forthcoming Spending Review considers the differing impact these measures will have on women and men.
“In particular government will need to go further than just a household income level impact analysis if they are to gauge the likely impact of their policies on every day women's lives in any meaningful way.
"At the same time, keeping public sector pay rises at below inflation levels – a real terms pay cut – will also affect women disproportionately, as they make up the bulk of the public sector workforce.
Cooper believes that this has come about because there are now so few women at the top of government.
"This is the problem with having so few women in the cabinet, nobody asks the question," she said.Story published on Womens Views on News, December 7, 2012
Friday, 7 December 2012
Working households in poverty says report
Story published in Women's Views on News, December 3, 2012A new report finds that the nature of poverty in the UK is changing.
And most working-age households affected by poverty are in work rather than unemployed, with low income (or poverty) defined as ‘people living in households with income below 60 per cent of the median for that year’.
For the tax year ending 5 April 2012, the median gross annual earnings for men were £28,700, and for women were £23,100.
According to the report, ’Monitoring Poverty and Social Exclusion 2012′, written by the New Policy Institute for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation there are now 6.1 million people living on less than two thirds of the average wage – on around £8,400 a year.
And around 6.4 million workers are under-employed – wanting to work more but unable to obtain extra hours.
According to the Office for National Statistics, part-time workers are four times more likely to be those under-employed.
Just under one fifth of people in Britain are on low incomes at any one time, but poverty affects a third at some time in a four-year period.
Over half of the children living in poverty now live in working households.
And poverty is no longer confined to those living in social housing: most poor people live in the private rented sector.
The government’s welfare reforms are worsening their plight, as they are cutting things like tax credits and housing benefits, which the working poor need to supplement low wages and meet rising housing costs.
And these trends are more likely to affect women. Women living in the most deprived areas can now expect to live shorter lives than men in the richest parts of the UK.
The report concludes that ’changing the benefits system will not solve problems such as in-work poverty, increasing underemployment and rising health inequalities’.
According to a recent TUC study, three quarters of the UK’s over 8 million part-time workers are women and they earn 36 per cent less per hour than full-time workers.
The regional earnings distribution figures released recently by the Office for National Statistics showed how wages in the UK differed by sex.
.
While weekly earnings were highest in London for both sexes, earnings for men were lowest in Northern Ireland, at £479, and for women they were lowest in the East Midlands, at £402.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



